|
|
Home » CONSUMER ISSUES » Predatory Lending
Predatory Lending
CFC supports re-regulation of credit markets, caps on payday loan interest rates, and assistance with loan restructuring and forgiveness for victims of predatory lenders.
Click here to receive updates about Predatory Lending issues via RSS.
CFC Opposes AB 377 (Mendoza) - Pro Payday Lenders, Anti Borrower
by Consumer Federation of California
Instead of increasing maximum loan amounts, legitimizing internet payday lending and offering unattractive re-payment plans, California should embrace the growing national consensus that predatory payday lending practices must be reined in to reduce the debt crisis facing low income consumers.
Credit Cardholders Bill of Rights Reintroduced in the House
by Zack Kaldveer, Consumer Federation of California
March 11th, 2009
At a time when our economy sits on the brink of collapse, and millions of consumers face record debt and the likelihood of foreclosure, CFC remains strongly supportive of reigning in the abusive and predatory practices of the credit card industry.
CFC Urges Sen. Feinstein to co-sponsor Bill to Crack Down on Predatory Lending
by Richard Holober, Executive Director, Consumer Federation of California
March 10th, 2009
By limiting the total cost of consumer credit to 36 percent, Congress will keep billions of dollars in the hands of low and moderate-income consumers, enabling them to spend those dollars to pay bills, buy groceries, and help their families, not high cost lenders.
Statewide Organization Launches Foreclosure Hotline -- for Tenants
by Tenant's Together
February 24th, 2009
Tenants Together, California’s Statewide Organization for Renters’ Rights, is launching a new hotline for tenants in foreclosure situations. Tenants Together announced the hotline to address a growing problem – the harassment and displacement of tenants who are innocent victims of the mortgage crisis. California tenants should call: 415.495.8012.
Landmark Credit Card Reform Bill Moves to House Floor
by Zack Kaldveer, Consumer Federation of California
August 1st, 2008
If enacted, H.R. 5244 would help tens of millions of Americans avoid increasing and undeserved debt while beginning a long overdue effort by Congress to prevent a second "subprime like meltdown" that would send our economy into an even deeper recession.
California's Foreclosure Crisis and the State Legislature
by Zack Kaldveer, CFC, California Progress Report
February 15th, 2008
As California's foreclosure crisis continues unabated and families are being ousted from their homes at an unprecedented pace, the state legislature is finally taking action.
Wells Fargo Facing Lawsuit Over Deposit Errors
by Elizabeth Wenger, CBS Channel 5
July 23rd, 2010
Richard Holober of the Consumer Federation of California said.."It's an effort to say 'we have a cost and we have chosen not to fix these errors because it's more expensive to fix than ignore...all those little ATM mistakes could be a windfall for Wells.
Consumer financial agency must be set up to police mortgage market
by Editorial, San Jose Mercury News
August 18th, 2010
The subprime-driven foreclosure crisis has been disastrous for some minority communities, and its ripple effects have brought economic calamity to much of the country. As federal officials develop regulations to govern the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, they must invest it with the authority to prevent such abuses in the future.
Wells Fargo faces larger suit on overdraft fees
by Robert Selna, San Francisco Chronicle
August 12th, 2010
Wells Fargo garnered more than $1.4 billion in overdraft fees just in California from 2005 to 2007, according to court documents. Nationwide, banks and credit unions collected almost $24 billion in overdraft fees in 2008, according to the Center for Responsible Lending.
At last, oversight of fat cat lenders
by Editorial, Sacramento Bee
July 22nd, 2010
It creates a Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, with a director appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate and independent rule-making and enforcement authority. Inexplicably, Congress chose to put it in the Federal Reserve; a truly stand-alone agency would have been preferable, particularly in the regulation of mortgage and credit card practices.
|
|