Donate
 

Home   »  CONSUMER ISSUES  »  Campaign/Budget Reform

Campaign Reform

CFC is committed to replacing our “pay to play” campaign finance system with public election financing, to make it more possible for candidates to run without depending on corporate handouts.

Click here to receive updates about Campaign Reform issues via RSS.

Bills to Watch
CFC Supports AB 919 (Nava) - The Shareholder Protection Act - Defeated
AB 919 is a critical step in the effort to protect shareholders and limit the influence of big money in politics. It requires corporations to consult their shareholders and give them an opportunity to opt out of having their money spent on elections and political activities.

CFC Articles
Moving beyond smoking tent budgets - Mobilizing a new electoral majority
by Richard Holober, Executive DirectorConsumer Federation of California
August 17th, 2009
Perhaps Albert Einstein was gazing into a crystal ball, viewing California’s 2008-2009 budget debacle, when he said "the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results."
Repeal the 2/3's Budget Rule - No More Budget Crises and Wasteful Special Elections!
by Zack Kaldveer, Communications DirectorConsumer Federation of California
April 30th, 2009
California is one of only three states that require a two-thirds vote in the legislature to pass a budget regardless of the depth of the crisis...To restore budget sanity, fiscal responsibility, and tax fairness, the 2/3’s rule must be repealed.
Comparing Reforms: "Open Primary", 2/3’s Rule, Public Financing, and Ranked Choice Voting
by Zack Kaldveer, Communications DirectorConsumer Federation of California
March 3rd, 2009
If nothing else, this year's budget fiasco has created an outcry for governance reform. But rather than look to electoral gimmicks, we should instead support proven systems that work, like public financing of elections and ranked choice voting.

CFC Editorials
PG&E Customers Killed Prop 16
by Richard Holober, CFC Executive DirectorCalifornia Progress Report
PG&E spent $46 million of its ratepayer dollars on Prop 16 to make sure our electric rates remain high, without asking the consent of its ratepayers.
Prop 15: Step One in Breaking Big Money's Strangle Hold on California Elections
by Zack Kaldveer, Consumer Federation of CaliforniaCalifornia Progress Report
June 3rd, 2010
...all but one of the donors to the ballot committee opposing Prop 15 comes from either a lobby firm, individual lobbyist, or a lobby employer – including BP's lobby firm, Political Solutions.
California Needs The FCC To Restore The Fairness Doctrine
by Richard Holober, Consumer Federation of California and Roy Ulrich, California Tax Reform AssociationHuffington Post
May 6th, 2010
...the effect of broadcasters' refusal to provide under-funded campaigns free response time since the repeal of the Fairness Doctrine for ballot measures...has been to increase the amount of one-sided information voters receive before entering the voting booth.

CFC in the News
Special interests capitalize on Legislature's end-of-session chaos
by Shane Goldmacher and Evan HalperLos Angeles Times
August 30th, 2010
Consumer activists expressed anger that the amendment was even drafted so late in the session. Richard Holober, executive director of the Consumer Federation of California, said "these kind of last-minute moves are for things that won't hold up if exposed to sunlight. It is not a good way to govern."
State investigation fingers vendor for missing San Mateo County voter guides
by Bonnie EslingerSan Jose Mercury News
August 9th, 2010
The case of San Mateo County's missing voter guides has been solved -- sort of. Some were apparently never sent, according to Secretary of State Debra Bowen, who heads the California agency that oversees elections.
Voters Defeat Proposition 17, The Mercury Insurance Initiative
by Campaign for Consumer RightsCampaign for Consumer Rights
June 10th, 2010
Ignoring a deceptive $16 million campaign by Mercury Insurance Company, California voters rejected a ballot measure that would have amended 1988 insurance reform Proposition 103 to allow insurance companies to impose surcharges on motorists who were not previously insured or had a break in coverage for virtually any reason.

Breaking News and Alerts
Big-money lobbyists ruled at legislative session's end
by Jim SandersSacramento Bee
September 2nd, 2010
Senate Bill 797, a proposal to ban BPA - bisphenol A - in baby bottles and sippy cups that was supported by labor and environmental groups but opposed by the American Chemistry Council and a coalition of business groups. The bill died by two votes in the Senate.
Legislative Analyst Says Prop 26 Increases Budget Deficit By $1 Billion
by Artem RaskinCalifornia Progress Report
July 29th, 2010
The LAO's nonpartisan analysis released last week revealed that Proposition 26 would nullify the "Gas Tax Swap" approved by the legislature in March, and eliminate about one billion dollars annually in anticipated revenues from the general fund for schools and other programs.
Oil industry is driving force behind Proposition 23...
by Michael Hiltzik Los Angeles Times
July 28th, 2010
The driving force behind the initiative is the oil industry, which has contributed more than $2.3 million to getting it passed. The biggest single contributor is San Antonio-based Valero Energy ($1.05 million, according to the latest state campaign disclosures), with San Antonio-based Tesoro Corp. in second place with $525,000.


Bookmark and Share

 

Join the fight for Campaign Reform!


facebook twitter
RSS  |  Contact Info  |  Privacy Policy  |  Sitemap